'Controlling Organized Crime Essay\r'

'Combating organize offence finish be an intricate task. Various truths survive in the fight against nonionic offensive, and more or less sustain been successful in prosecuting several atoms of unionised umbrage mathematical groups. However, without the refinement of such rectitudes, organised horror groups forget just find ways to get slightly such rightfulnesss. Law enforcement efforts to beset organise umbrage stop run into limitations as far as what law enforcement can and can non do. Laws need to be changed to repress such limitations. Without the changing of such laws, law enforcement efforts to competitiveness organized crime depart be close wasted. unionized crime has be grapple a development problem over the last several years. organise crime can exist in every community and strikes fear into the individuals which live in the communities in which an organized crime group has set up base. An organized crime group will come into a community where th e government is weak, or closely non-existent. Setting up base in these types of communities makes it easier for the organized crime group to perform their il effective activities.\r\n organized crime groups nominate their hands in m all contraband activities meant to make m atomic number 53y. Illegal activities such as loan sharking, prostitution, illegal gambling, drug trafficking and human trafficking argon just nigh examples of the activities organized crime groups ar involved in. The problem with stopping these activities is that in that location can be a great number of stack from one group committing these crimes, and getting to the â€Å"big fish” is just about impossible. Even if the small players atomic number 18 interpreted out of the game, those people likely will not tell who they are working for, making it almost impossible to take bring the entire group. With organized crime reaching across state and inelegant boundaries, combating organized crime ca n run into legal limitations. Each state’s and country’s territorial requirements are going to vary. Different jurisdictional requirements make it almost impossible for law enforcement from one jurisdiction to apprehend shepherds crooks in an separate jurisdiction. Organized crime groups are aware of these problems with jurisdictions and will character this knowledge to their advantage when committing criminal acts (Limbaugh, 2010).\r\nA major(ip) national law mean to combat the ontogeny problem of organized crime is the 1965 /1967 Mafia-membership (law proposed by Senator tail McClellan) Senate Bill 2187, 89th Congress, Senate Bill 678, 90th Congress. This law states that any person who knowingly and willfully becomes, or trunk a member of the mafia, or any early(a) organized crime group, in which the group operates illegal activities such as gambling, extortion, blackmail, narcotics, prostitution, or labor deal, and the member has previous knowledge of such activities committed by the organized crime group, is subject to a punishment of no less than five years save no more than 20 years in prison and fines up to $20,000.00 (â€Å"Organized Crime And federal Legislation”, n.d.). This particular piece of legislation appears that it would be very effective in combating organized crime. fetching out the small players in an organized crime group could lead law enforcement to the top of the chain-of-command, thereof effectively taking down the group as a whole. Another federal law intended to combat organized crime is the Racketeer Influenced and screw up Organizations (RICO) regulation.\r\nThe RICO Statute provides penalties for persons involved in racketeering activities. Racketeering includes criminal acts committed such as any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, transaction in an obscene manner, or dealing in a controlled substance. I think this law would withal be very effective in combating organized crime as organized crime groups are likely to be involved in some form of racketeering. Having laws such as the RICO Statute can bring down an entire organized crime group, as each member will likely be involved in some form of racketeering. Laws such as this one may not completely stop an organized crime group from committing such criminal acts, but this law may make an organized crime group think twice about committing such criminal acts.\r\nThe continual refining of such laws intended to combat organized crime would create better efforts for the law enforcement fight against organized crime. As times change, organized crime groups are becoming smarter, and using immature technology in the commission of criminal acts. in operation(p) an online store to sell counterfeit clothing afield would be one such example of drug abuse of new technology. Laws need to be refined to obtain up with the changing criminal world.\r\nLaws written prior to the introduction of the internet did not take into notice the changes that would come over time, so such laws have to be re-written to accommodate technology such as the internet. The fight against organized crime will be a never-ending effort. As long as there is public demand for prostitution, illegal drugs, and other services provided by organized crime groups, there will be organized crime. Taking down organized crime groups will have to be a joint effort amongst all law enforcement agencies, federal and state. By combining resources of state and federal law enforcement, a better handle can be gotten on the fight against organized crime.\r\nReferences\r\nLimbaugh, S. (2010). haughty Organized Crime. Retrieved from\r\nhttp://voices.yahoo.com/controlling-organized-crime-6835298.html Organized Crime and Federal Legislation. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.organized-\r\ncrime.de/OCLAWS.htm\r\n'